Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Should bloggers be subject to a Code of Conduct?
I agree with one of the interviewee’s of the article that people are much less inclined to monitor their words or care about the effects their statements have on others when communicating over the net. The internet has created an impersonal, anonymous environment where users ‘feel’ safe in saying things they would never otherwise say to someone in person. I don’t necessarily agree that a Code of Conduct with and/or without legal ramifications for misconduct should be employed however; I do agree that service providers of blog forums should provide tools for users to block unwanted participation. Perhaps providers should be responsible for taking measures, based on complaints and evidence, to block abusive users from the site all together when user control is ineffective (i.e. blog site owner blocks harassing user and they continue to create new accounts and post unwanted statements on the owners site).
After reading the statement within the article, “the fact that there’s all these really messed up people on the internet…” I realized there are more opportunities now for perpetrators to victimize others and the legal lines become grey when the web is involved. What makes it okay for someone to verbally and sexually harass someone, or send death threats to others over the internet, and not be held as accountable as they would be in person or over the telephone? Should we just create a separate legal system for the internet?
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Commercials and TV
Monday, March 26, 2007
Mass Media's Power
Taken from http://www.passia.org/seminars/99/media_and_communication/rami2.html
Our world today is increasingly driven by a combination of information and
entertainment values, and these are both promoted by the explosion of
different means of communication, especially electronic communication such
as satellite TV and Internet. This means the market for information is
extremely competitive and is characterized by the
following:
1. Overload on the audience: Most people today, even in many developing countries, have access
to scores of information sources in their homes and offices, including
television, radio, internet and others. The audience is over-loaded with
options, so if you want to catch someone's attention via the mass media you
have to produce quality material that is deemed appropriate to use by
journalists and deemed worth reading or viewing by the
audience.
2. Overload on the mass media: Most journalists are flooded with sources of information, press
releases, story ideas and requests for coverage. This means that if you want to
attract a journalist's or editor's attention and get coverage in their
publication or on their channel, you have to produce quality information and PR
materials that are credible and that catch the press's
attention.
3. Overload on funders and advertisers: Those people who pay money to the mass media or to
non-governmental organizations - advertisers and funders - are also flooded with
more requests than they can meet. So it is critically important for NGOs today
to produce high quality work if they wish to attract funds from donors or
support from companies that have the option to spend their money on direct
advertising and promotion.
Using this power, Mass media has an outlet to pour whatever drivel into our homes that will grant the greatest money to both themselves and advertisers. A perfect example of this is a new show coming out on MTV called Scarred. http://www.mtv.com/ontv/dyn/scarred/series.jhtml#/ontv/dyn/scarred/summary.jhtml
This show is a graphic look at self-inflicted injuries due to extreme sports and the stories that surround them. Their website is quoted, " This show is almost too painful to watch!" Shows like this will draw shock value attention to grab advertising money.
I am not arguing that we need to place restrictions on what can or should be allowed on television, I am arguing that we as a society should be aware of the power of the media and not be slaves to it.
Political Evolution
The creator of the video is currently known http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/who-created-hillary-1984_b_43978.html and Hillary handled the situation with humor however; the video was an obvious attempt to manipulate public perceptions. How does one know which source to trust with all the interest groups and respective character assassinations toward opponents of political campaigns and agendas? In addition, how does the reader protect himself/herself from such manipulation? Often people blindly believe information without question and further research…
I can honestly say that after reading the following information listed on http://www.radaronline.com/features/2006/10/americas_dumbest_congressmen_a_radar_special_report.php about congressmen and women currently in office, I thought it is only a matter of time before our country is in a major crisis (more so than we already are). How do these men and women, democrat and/or republican, get into such positions of power? This article reinforced my belief that we have a group of unintelligent, ignorant, lazy (109th Congress reported as the least effective and productive group), poor examples of leaders on Capital Hill these days. Okay, to support what I have been saying…how do I know what was reported in this article is accurate and not guided by the opinions and agendas of others? Am I just as guilty as the next? What is your guilt? If nothing else, at least question yourself?
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Buying American
Many people in the United States and other countries want to support their economy. They would like jobs to remain on their soil; however, globalization is making it more difficult. Buying American-made products is becoming more blurred.
One industry I thought was quite definitive was the automobile industry. I thought it was easy to tell which automobiles where made in America: Ford and GM. However, after reading the USA Today article, “How do you tell which car is American” it is obvious that there are some discrepancies.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2007-03-22-american-usat_N.htm?POE=click-refer
The article counts parts made in Canada as American parts, but not pieces made in Mexico. They both border the United States. Why does one count, but not the other? Furthermore, Canada and Mexico are part of North America, but I do not consider them part of the United States. I never knew I had to be concerned about where specific parts of a product came from; I used the brand name to judge American-made products. I now know that if I truly want to buy a product made in America, I must judge more than their brand name!
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
technology is taking over
Global Warming and Information
"The greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda. Perceiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind, but in the information age (or as I think of it, the disinformation age) it takes on a special urgency and importance." Michael Crichton, Science writer and author 'State of Fear'.
Propoganda that was once reserved for the Cold War is now being turned towards Global Warming because it is a hot topic. Similarly to the Y2K scare of 1999. This big tadoo about how the world was going to end because of it, Global Warming is not going to be drastic climate change, it will happen gradually over 100s of years. What most of the general public fails to recognize is that the earth has been much hotter, with higher levels of CO2 in the past, and life survived. The world is a dynamic world with constantly changing climate. Ice Ages come and go, heat waves happen. Volcanic Eruptions have a more devestating impact on the earth than our industrialization. This fear culture is in direct relation to the amount of information availible and how utilization of that information can depend on a person's motivation.
http://www.globalwarminghysteria.com/
Monday, March 19, 2007
The weekend
My Technology Equation
I began thinking about this heavily over the weekend because I have a friend that met someone over the internet and how not more than a decade ago, this would have been impossible. Add Avatar to the equation and one truly can become anything imaginable. Add mental illness and your life may be in danger if you trust the wrong people. Throw children into the mix and hope that you can block, as well as protect them from as much harm as possible. I asked my colleague what he thought about technologies impact on socialization and here is what he had to say:
“Through the smoke and bustle of a crowded bar, a pair of eyes lock. And so begins a chain of behaviors that has evolved over thousands of years. There are an infinite number of potential outcomes to the chain. Some chains are short, some chains light. Some chains inflict pain, and other lead nowhere. Nevertheless, sometimes, the chain ends in a lock.
Or that’s how it was.
Now, the process might begin, proceed and end, not like a chain, but like a spider’s web. Sometimes, the spider weaves a veil worn to live out a secrets or fantasies. Sometimes the web hides a deeper danger than even a poisonous spider. And, while it is not as strong as a chain, sometimes the web binds two blossoming flowers. The spider has entered new territory and sees no boundaries.
Web based social networking, in all of its forms, has both positive and negative potential. Like all things, when done in moderation, it is can be useful. But, whether it is viewed as a positive or negative, it must be seen as a real change from the traditional way things are done.
It has taken what was once the most physical of experiences and removed the physical boundaries (or at least delayed them). For instance, your social network is no longer bound by space and time. You may chat with a teenage girl from some province in Mongolia or by way of simulations programs; you could just as easily chat with her great ancestor Genghis Khan. Reality/Veracity need not play a factor in the relationships you build. While this may not be different from the physical world, it is much easier in the ether of the internet.
I would be glad to write more on the subject but someone is messaging me.”
And so here is yet another example of how technology has effected our social behaviors...Down time at work + class assignments + internet access = fun, wasted man hours, possible unemployment, and many other unknowns...
Monday, March 12, 2007
Todays Technology
Assistive Technology Expands Horizons
An article posted on http://www.futureofchildren.org/usrdoc/vol10no2Art5.pdf discusses the dramatic impact that assistive technology and adaptive equipment has on educational opportunities for children with special needs (emotional, speech or language impairments, specific learning disabilities, etc.). Technology has made it possible for these children to learn in the classroom alongside traditional students. The most shocking detail, in my opinion, from this report is that approximately 1 out of 6 students in 2000 could not fully participate in classroom activities due to their disability. The Centers for Disease Control recently announced that, “the number of children living with autism is even higher than previously thought. According to the latest and most comprehensive study, as many as one in 150 children in the United States have an autism spectrum disorder.” (www.BarberInstitute.org)
Technology has not only “flattened the world,” it has also made what was once deemed impossible for many a dream come true!
Sunday, March 11, 2007
The medical field will see even more changes as technology continues to grow. When you schedule your next visit to the doctor and he or she says you will need surgery make sure you ask who will be assisting with the surgery and where he, she or it will be located.
Surgeries conducted with the help of robots make it possible for doctors to consult with other surgeons miles away in other countries. I guess two heads are better than one, especially when it comes to vital organs in my body. As our reading has suggested this week, maybe the world is becoming flat.
I know someone who recently had open-heart surgery and the incision is huge. The recovery time is also very lengthy. However, there may be an alternative available soon. AESOP, a robot used in cardiac surgery, would eliminate the large incision patients have and the sternum also would not have to be cracked. Instead, surgeons make three small incisions near the ribs. Early data suggests that recovery time is shortened when robots assist with heart surgery (Meadows, 2002).
While much of the early data on robotic surgery is positive, for some reason I am still hesitant. One day, however, this may no longer be a concern of mine.
http://www.fda.gov/Fdac/features/2002/302_bots.html
http://www.seattlecca.org/aboutscca/pressRoom/archive/robots.htm
Through a Child's eyes
Looking every so inquizatively at the box in the corner.
What is this?
1991 - It was a good year, Bush/Clinton Presidential Race: lets talk politics. But wait, whats that in the corner?
From the moment I saw it, i was intrigued. A magic box: full of possibilities
The first time i saw a computer was the fall of 1991. My elementry school had recently purchased a computer to help in the education of the students. Our 4th grade class was given the first opportunity to use it. A simple math and spelling program was offered. My how poorly i could type. As a child growing up in a country school district, I was not privy to using typewriters. In the school office while working for the secretary, I was asked to type something up. I couldn't do it. For the life of me I could not get the hang of typing.
Looking at today's society, I am still amazed as to how far we have come. From 1991 to 1997, typing and computer classes were being offered through the school to prepare us for what was to come. Then in 1999, i took my first Visual Basic course. Still I could not get the hang of typing. With the advent of instant messaging systems like AIM and YIM, finally there was an outlet that provided motivation to learn this new technology other than just passing a class.
When i first saw the computer, i was perplexed, intrigued and mystified. How can such a small mechanical box truely change the world? It was simply a tool to get work done. Thats what my parents told me. But this magic little box, had the power to unite peoples far and wide. Bringing into the home all the information once reserved to my grandmother's bookshelf down the street.
Thursday, March 8, 2007
Technologies I have known
Integrated digital VGA camera
Mobile Instant Messaging using AOL® Instant MessengerTM
Photo phone book and picture Caller ID
T-Mobile myFaves compatible.
These are the obvious Technologies that have changed the world for better or worse ; that is still to be determined. There are so many other Technologies advancing behind our backs, if we arn't careful they may run us over some day.
Medicine has changed how and when we have children. This has allowed for later marriages and families. Our quality of life and even death are options we can choose.
Court hears blood on road matches Falconio's DNA
DNA map to help brew better coffee
DNA warrants solving more crimes
DNA evidence frees man on death row
Changes in school were teaching was in the class room - today you can earn a degree online.
We are so super connected at all times that we don't socialize as people anymore.We do it in virtual worlds.